Talk:Ranthambore Fort
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]The history of the fort seems to be the history of JAT comunity......there is no evidance that chauman belongs to any jat clan ..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.109.160.92 (talk) 03:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Disputed dates
[edit]I can't find much beyond tourist books, and UNESCO isn't infallible but it does show that the date of its foundation isn't definite.[1] Doug Weller (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- I am coming from Sam Sailor's talk page. I have no opinion on the content but the link you mentioned above isn't from UNESCO. It's a Government website which is about the Hill Forts of Rajasthan which only happens to be a World Heritage Site. Solomon7968 17:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Rajasthan articles
- High-importance Rajasthan articles
- C-Class Rajasthan articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Rajasthan articles
- C-Class Indian history articles
- Mid-importance Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Historic sites articles
- Unknown-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles