Talk:Quality assurance/Archives/2011
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about Quality assurance. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality assurance article should be better
As an article on quality assurance, this article should be a lot better. There are quite a few clumsy sentences here, for example, in the first lines "When the first specialized craftsmen arose manufacturing tools for others..." which is not a proper English sentence. Beyond this, there should be a more systematic, detailed and well cited historical overview. At the moment it is a bit shabby. So perhaps here would be a good place to start practicing quality assurance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.113.27 (talk) 12:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, the article is not very good. In my opinion it is not very easy to understand and does not address one of the main issues, the difference between QA and QC. In fact, in some places the article is confusing both. I do not have time for a complete review, but I would suggest to remark that QA is related to processes (i.e. ensure that a process to attain quality is followed) while QC is related to products (i.e. ensure that a product has attained the required quality by measurement of specified attributes). QC ensures quality, and QA cannot, but QA is usually a lot cheaper because it helps to avoid early deviations that would lead to bad products - that is, QA can improve the average quality of the products, and can also reduce the QC costs (e.g. sampling frequency and sample size could be reduced). Typical QA activities are process audits - to ensure that the proper process is followed and the required outputs are produced at each stage; typical QC activities are componente and product testing. Brindis15 (talk) 06:17, 28 May 2011 (UTC)