Talk:Puretic power block

A fact from Puretic power block appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Puretic power block revolutionized the technology of hauling purse seine nets on seine fishing vessels?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/May.

Wikipedia

Fisheries and Fishing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

RS

Hello @Epipelagic: I provided a review^[1] supporting the claims, source and reliability. When editing I did not anticipate an objection like

revert claim the Puretic power block is used by white people as an instrument of racial oppression. The main citation is to a very recent primary source with only one citation. It sits behind a paywall, making it difficult to assess whether it just a spoof article attempting to see how far wokeness can be pushed.

Invasive Spices (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Bennett, Nathan; Alava, Juan; Ferguson, Caroline; Blythe, Jessica; Morgera, Elisa; Boyd, David; Cote, Isabelle (2023). "Environmental (in)justice in the Anthropocene ocean". Marine Policy. 147. Elsevier BV: 105383. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105383. ISSN 0308-597X.

You are correct that the journal Marine Policy would, in current Wikipedia terms, be assessed as a reliable source, Since it is not the place here to speculate on the motives of the decision makers at that journal, I have reinstated your entry racially politicizing the Puretic power block. It seems Wikipedia is now embarking on what may be an indeterminable tumble from relative rationality. — Epipelagic (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly that is not my intent. I will work to find agreeable text to ameliorate that. How has Wikipedia changed in this regard? I don't understand that part. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another example, that just happened between you asking your question and me replying. – Epipelagic (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's very different. That should easily be treated as WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTDICT and because the speaker is not a lexicographer WP:RS. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you're not seeing the connection — Epipelagic (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand. They can both appear to be woke politics. However WP:V is very different in these 2 instances. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Bennett, Nathan; Alava, Juan; Ferguson, Caroline; Blythe, Jessica; Morgera, Elisa; Boyd, David; Cote, Isabelle (2023). "Environmental (in)justice in the Anthropocene ocean". Marine Policy. 147. Elsevier BV: 105383. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105383. ISSN 0308-597X.

[1]