Jump to content

Talk:Pullman National Historical Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pullman National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update of Infobox Image

[edit]

@alanscottwalker Can you explain why a tightly cropped, low-resolution, keystoned shot of the Administration building from 14 years ago (before the visitors center was completed in 2021) is “better” than a recent photo which shows the entire Administration complex? I disagree with your revert. Atonarks (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because your picture is too far away (also, fyi, your ping never worked, probably because you did not capitalize). Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize pings were case sensitive, sorry about that. I've cropped it in about as tight as I can get it and updated the file. Would this be a better fit?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pullman_NHP_Factory_Building.jpg Atonarks (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly better, I don't see why we need the two arches of the missing (demolished) wing -- the thing to remember with this is, that's not the whole site, regardless, nor even the whole manufacturing complex. So all this picture needs to be is an intro picture, and, for example, the admin building front profile is what was influential in the popular culture section, so makes a good intro (and yes needs to be readily visible (aka big) on all manner of platforms). Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]