This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm not sure this should be classified as belonging to protohistory, which is generally described as a "period between prehistory and history, during which a culture or civilization has not yet developed writing, but other cultures have already noted its existence in their own writings". Who in the area was writing about these peoples? Shouldn't this be described as "prehistoric" or "Precolumbian"? Heiro00:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No biggy, was just wondering if there was something I was missing. As far as I know the only fully "historic" peoples in the Americas at the time were the Mayans (Maya script) who basically only wrote about themselves, lol. I'm fine with the changes you've made here and at Pueblo II Era, unless you feel they need to be further qualified. The 2 articles are looking pretty good btw, nice work. Heiro04:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]