Talk:Psychic vampire/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Weasel and NPOV

Well I read the article and I can say I am impressed. It got better. While I still believe it is a non existing topic trying to convince us of it's existance, I believe the article got to a point where the NPOV and Weasel warnings can be removed. Just make sure to change "some culture" to something more precise. Bragador 23:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Well, good for you, but then going ahead and removing them shortly later under the claim that there were "no objections" is pretty silly, as you gave nobody any time to object. DreamGuy 06:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Almost true... The weasel one was put on by me in the first place anyway and there are still no opposition but for a subject like this one, it's good to keep them anyway. I was trying to reward you all for you effort. Keep working hard ! Bragador 22:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

I believe the Weasle Talk warning can be removed now.--– sampi (talk•contrib) 08:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps the weasels can (I disagree but will not comment), however the article still caries a predominantly defensive tone. This is unfortunately not quite the neutral point of view. Falcon 18:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Having both "PoV" and "weasel" is to over-egg the pudding. The article is PoV; we don't need to add all the ways in which it's PoV. One template is enough; more is just attacking the article without doing anything constructive. Put it up for AfD by all means (I'd vote for delete), but we shouldn't try to achieve the same result by pasting it with sneers. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 00:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

External links and sources

Just make sure that the external links section does NOT contain source material. If it does it must be included under the "sources" section. Bragador 21:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Biased and Disputed?

This tag is on, yet there's no talk. The goal in Wikipedia should be to resolve misunderstandings, so let's do that. What is being criticized as being biased and disputed in this article? Perhaps changes could be made to remedy it. -Tyciol 19:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Links to relevant information

I'm not a member, and not familiar with Wikipedia custom. So before I do something inexcusable, I will leave the following links. To my experience, most of the following information is correct.

For information on "real vampirism": http://www.angelfire.com/home/darkrealms/resource.html

For psi-vampire specific information, you can go here: http://www.angelfire.com/home/darkrealms/psifeed.html

If you wish to speak with people claiming to suffer from real vampirism, there are those that would happily talk on these forums (both sanguine and psychic vampires frequent this forum): http://p200.ezboard.com/bdarkrealms43343

Lastly, I wish to draw attention to "the beast", as said above. I have not seen proof of this yet (though I admit to having little experience with sanguine vampires), however, that does sound very similar to "the beast" in the VTM roleplaying game, and is therefore questionable (real vampires are very irritated when compared with roleplayers and/or lifestylists).

Its not just the New Age you know...

Its occultism in general dealing with psichyc vamps...

>You appear to be making a distinction that doesn't exist 118.90.45.66 (talk) 04:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Un-needed link deleted

A link was put on there (titled: Energy Vampires' official site) that had nothing to do with the actual subject. It was a band link, btw. I took it out. If you wanna put it back, fine, but say something first and tell us why a band link should be put on a page that is talking about the condition of energy vampires. Disinclination 05:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Disinclination

Energy Vampirism in fiction

Should the article mention fictional examples of Energy Vampirism? For example, the Wraith on Stargate Atlantis, as well as the Atavus on Earth: Final Conflict are both fictional types of Energy Vampires.

70.17.139.55 18:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)