Jump to content

Talk:Psalms of Solomon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just about totally disputed

[edit]

I'm going to insist on a reference for the assertion in this article that the PssSol are considered canonical by the Orthodox. While they may indeed be found in some mss of the LXX, they are not in fact canonical that I have every heard about. So-- Who sez? TCC (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You needn't insist, a request should be sufficient, better yet edit it as you see fit. The offending sentence was inserted by an anonymous editor who only made edits on one day in September 2005, unless he/she later registered. There are two possibilities for misinterpretation that I can see. The other editor may have confused Psalms of Solomon with Wisdom of Solomon or Odes of Solomon, and the article only says the book is accepted, not canonical, which I view as different, although I can see why to some readers it may imply being in the canon. If you are familiar with the Orthodox position, please correct the record. --Blainster 20:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to cut it if there's information somewhere that supports it, improbable as that might seem in my opinion. I've had trouble recently with editors who come in like gangbusters and make massive (and from my POV, highly dubious) changes without any discussion, and it's been driving me nuts. So as to avoid doing the same thing, I wanted to give whoever put the information in the opportunity to defend it before I did anything with it. TCC (talk) (contribs) 20:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More on Greek Orthodox canon

[edit]

I removed the recent anon. assertion that P of S is part of the Greek canon. The Oxford Annotated NRSV Bible states that the Greek Orthodox church uses the Catholic deuterocanonical books plus 1 Esdras, Psalm 151, the Prayer of Manasseh, and 3 Maccabees (4 Maccabees is in the appendix but not considered canonical). The online Encyclopedia Britannica states that the P of S is not part of any scriptural canon. This agrees with the position of editor TCC. A change will require good sources. --Blainster 20:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Psalms of Solomon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]