Talk:Portland Castle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portland Castle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Portland Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 21, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 29, 2015.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the heart of Portland Castle is the keep, comprising a central tower with two wings on either side and a gun battery to the front?

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Change to citation style...

I'm keen to take this article up to Good Article status. As part of that, I'd like to alter the citation style.

The current style takes the form of long citations for books, with single "p"s for multiple pages and no mention of authors, only the publisher, and no location or ISBN number; and the cite web template for web pages, using date-month-year style date formats. I'd like to use the harvnb template, using the author's name, with automatic linking to a new bibliography section with full information on the volume, and cite web template with the mode=cs2 applied, with day-month-year formatting.

As examples:

a) a book citation such as "English Heritage (2000). Portland Castle. English Heritage. p. 10, 11." would look like "Lawson 2000, pp. 10-11". The full version in the bibliography would appear as: "Lawson, Susannah (2000). Portland Castle, Dorset. London, UK: English Heritage. ISBN 9781850747253.".

b) a web citation such as ""The Garden at Portland Castle". English Heritage. Retrieved 2014-08-17." would look like ""The Garden at Portland Castle", English Heritage, retrieved 17 August 2014".

With a large number of citations coming from the same source, I think this would look cleaner and be easier to edit. As per WP:CITEVAR, however, it would require prior consensus on this page. Thoughts welcomed! Hchc2009 (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Portland Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]