Talk:Politics of archaeology in Israel and Palestine
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Varun- The six day war entry seems unnecessary as part of a the page since it does not necessarily describes in detail the political consequences besides the fact Israel has laid claim to the sites an example i guess would be : "the Israeli claims to the heritage sites after the six day war pissed off so and so and all hell has broken lose. DumbArtStudent (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Marleen-I think it would be best to give more of a general stance on the controversy between the journalists and their counterparts rather than citing a few specific arguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnlinares (talk • contribs) 04:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would love to hear more about the controversy itself. I feel like you have a lot of buildup/background information but then we get to the end and the whole point of the page is brushed over. As Marleen mentioned, it would be nice to hear some different views on the topic (maybe that's how you can include the more recent sources you were talking about in class). (Spederse (talk) 13:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]
Whitney-I agree with Marleen as well. Thinking of the general wiki user I think a better explainnation of the different views of the politics is needed. (Wmwright (talk) 23:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]
The role of the settler organization Elad (Ir David Foundation) in Jerusalem is probably the most direct example of politics in archaeology. So I'm surprised it is missing from this article. Zerotalk10:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
