Talk:Plastic surgery/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 05:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your (2) edits to this article, Nikkilopezsuarez. Good articles are reviewed against six criteria. They are here: WP:GA?. On first glance this article is not close to meeting these criteria. In particular:

The lead section is too small. It should reflect and summarise the article contents. See WP:LEAD
Numerous sections lack citations. Active tags are present that request citations
Many sections are small and consist of a single sentence or two
The article is US-centric
There is a large list that should be converted to text
There is barely any discussion of complications or risks

In addition, I note you are a student and wish you well with your studies, but based on past experiences will not hold my breath for any response. I'll hold this review open for some days and then if there is no response mark it as failed. All the best, --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Failed per above.--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]