Talk:Pinus latahensis

A fact from Pinus latahensis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the fossil pine Pinus latahensis was named for the wrong geologic formation?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pinus latahensis.

Wikipedia

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Canada: The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Pinus latahensis needles

... that the fossil pine Pinus latahensis (pictured) was named for the wrong geologic formation? Source:Becker 1961
- ALT1:... that the estimated age of the fossil pine Pinus latahensis (pictured) has moved from Miocene to Early Eocene? Source: Miocene=Berry 1929, Ypresian= Makarkin & Archibald 2014)

Reviewed: Tropicagama

Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 18:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The article is long enough and new enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. I am approving the first hook as the most interesting and it is directly cited. A QPQ has been completed. The image is fine as free use. The only issue is that the last sentence needs to be referenced. SL93 (talk) 03:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: I have added the requested reference.--Kev min § 16:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is approved. SL93 (talk) 01:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]