Talk:PinupFiles
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability and other problems
[edit]@Loicdacreature: Since the page has an {{under construction}} tag, I held off tagging for obvious and serious problems. Most serious, the article does not cite significant coverage from independent reliable sources required by WP:WEBCRIT. The article's independent references are of very low quality (incidental mentions in porn blog interviews). The prose includes superlative claims attributed to the subject itself. It also has notability assertions without attribution. Finally, you should not need to say "notability" in the article prose if you can state objective facts supported by reliable references. See WP:PEACOCK. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Pornography articles
- Low-importance Pornography articles
- Stub-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles