Talk:Phone-paid Services Authority

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV-check

This article does not appear to be written from a neutral POV. It is written and structured like an advert for the organisation's services. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Courgette (talk • contribs) 13:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some improvements made: avoidance of second person and replacement with third person or passive voice. Further changes required to put the emphasis more on PP+ and what it does rather than on the advice which PP+ issues (though it is appropriate to keep this in some form. Also, the article paints a rather too benign picture of PRS and PP+'s efforts to regulate this industry. There is, in reality, a great deal of controversy about this industry and the quality of its regulation.

Dormu (talk) 12:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some more improvements are still necessary. I've been trying to find out the composition of the PhonepayPlus board and it's source of funding, and none of them are clear from the PpP website. I suspect that it is a public limited company industry-funded and operated under the eye of OFCOM.

Some mention of the controversies Dormu mentioned above is suitable, it seems there are issues of self-regulation, soft options, repeat offenders etc. I don't have the background to edit. Centrepull (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't provide information that would substantiate its notability to be included in WP. Surely a 'regulatory' body would be able to produce some independent 3rd party analysis or write up of itself. The article doesn't even mention specifically by which statutes or laws it has authority to do anything. What does it mean when the article says: making companies come to the regulator for prior approval. How do they do that? This article has many problems. The link to 'code of practice' is dead. Kbrose (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "Notability" tag: This is the official regulator, as approved by the UK Government! Added "References" tag instead. thisisace (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Icstis logo.gif

Image:Icstis logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on PhonepayPlus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.icstis.org.uk/about/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phone-paid Services Authority vs. PhonepayPlus logo

Organisation logo image in article still says PhonepayPlus. -- 79.74.158.196 (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]