While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
The article says PAN has ties to PPP. I certainly am no expert at all, I only knew PPP existed because of Bhutto, and I only just found PAN exists after watching a VICE documentary on YouTube. Nonetheless, in the video, Uzair Baloch - the main PAN guy - expresses severe hatred for the local PPP member of parliament (or whatever the legislative body in Pakistan is called) named Nabil Gabol - also in this News article, you'll see Uzair saying the PPP "has no future" http://dawn.com/2012/05/05/ppp-has-no-political-future-in-lyari-says-uzair-baloch/
So how exactly is PAN tied to PPP? It seems like PAN hates PPP very much. I'm not saying the article is wrong, perhaps indeed there are deeper ties. What are they, though? Leecharleswalker (talk) 08:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
