Talk:Ourisia microphylla

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Ourisia microphylla, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Use of Cite Q

Thanks User:YoungForever for editing this page. I often use the Cite Q template to cite scientific papers directly from Wikidata http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Template:Cite_Q. I do this because it helps link data about scientists, their papers, and their research between Wikipedia and Wikidata, and I want the reader to be able to click through to the Wikidata item for the paper. Cite Q also provides additional identifiers and links to the citation. However, you have removed the Wikidata links stating that "wiki is not a reliable source", and have removed the Cite Q template for some of my references, even though the citation provided multiple links and identifiers in the citation (including but not limited to the link to the Wikidata item). I could understand your reasoning if the Wikidata link was the only link provided, but these edits have actually resulted in the loss of information, because now there is only one link/identifier to the paper. Stitchbird2 (talk) 20:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]