Talk:Otra Nota
![]() | Otra Nota has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Otra Nota article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Otra Nota/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 03:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Erick! I've picked ut this for review. Regards. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 03:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Overview
[edit]- External links checked, only some changes the sub-domain and all the Allmusic sites changes their url, but nothing to worry about.
- No disambiguation links on the album.
- The nominator has been alerted of the GA review.
- The article has the correct (?), better to say is well structured into sections and sub-sections.
- It's well referenced
- Information is given with a good prose.
- It covers the topic very abroad and on a detailed form, without unnecesarry information.
- No certifications? (comment)
- Isn't it better of we rename the section Music to Music and lyrics?
Ok, nothing else to overview. I'l be reading the whole article today and write my prose comments. Cheers! --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 17:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I changed the section as suggestion. As for certifications, not as far as certifying authorities go. I think it did receive a certification in Puerto Rico, but that was before the RIAA started the Latin certifications in 2000 so it's not a certifying authority. [1] Erick (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. I've cheked everything. Good work. i think it's ready.
Verdict
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Final comment: Good work. An album article about a latin artist (no rare) long time waiting for review, and that seemed to need nothing but some little tweaks. Well done. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 19:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well that was easy. LOL :P Erick (talk) 19:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- The article is up to standard :) --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 19:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- GA-Class Latin music articles
- Low-importance Latin music articles
- GA-Class Tropical music articles
- Latin music articles
- GA-Class Puerto Rico articles
- Low-importance Puerto Rico articles
- GA-Class Puerto Rico articles of Low-importance