Talk:OpenNIC/Archive 1

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Internet

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles

This is an archive of past discussions about OpenNIC. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Offline links

As of 2007-05-05, I can't reach the OpenNIC web page http://www.opennic.unrated.net/public_servers.html, and none of the root servers I was using are reachable. Here is my old list of servers:

broken as of/before 2007-05-05: 131.161.247.232; 208.185.249.250; 208.185.249.251;

broken as of/before 2005-05-25: 64.81.44.19

broken as of/before 2004-10-23: 199.175.137.211 208.181.60.45 65.243.92.254 66.227.42.140 66.227.42.149

As of 2007-05-16 everything is functional again. The root zone server crashed and took several services down with it, including the website. Discussion is underway within the group on how best to add redundancy to all aspects of OpenNIC to prevent future problems.

Shdwdrgn 17:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Shdwdrgn

.glue -> .opennic.glue

According to http://wiki.opennic.glue/SponsoredTLDs, .opennic.glue is a TLD, not .glue 75.162.62.142 (talk) 05:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Namecoin support

As far as I am aware, Namecoin support is not a required feature (it is implemented on some but not all OpenNIC servers), so the statement currently in the "Peering" section is potentially misleading. Would there be any objections if I remove it? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 04:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)