Talk:One Step Closer (Linkin Park song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Linkin Park (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linkin Park, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Linkin ParkWikipedia:WikiProject Linkin ParkTemplate:WikiProject Linkin ParkLinkin Park articles

All of this stuff should be erased...

Please make sure if you claim something, there needs to be a source. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. Because if it doesn't have a source, it may just be an opinion. Please don't just say stuff unless it's got a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.198.103.159 (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of pop

I'm 100% that you're going to send me off but I suggest to move pop from infobox to Composition section. Yeah, it's sourced, but It's laughable AF and doesn't make any sense. Most people who see this on Wikipedia would doubt on credibility of Wikipedia or just be confused. I really hate Wikipedia's "we'll include information that the source says even if it's obvious that it's complete bullshit" rule. 178.176.214.99 (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I'm fairly certain the source is using the term 'pop' as in 'popular'. Solitude6nv5 (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too. Not to mention, "Pop" is an extremely vague term. It doesn't even always refer to the genre, like said above. If you looked hard enough, I'm sure many of their songs are called "pop" in reliable sources, since it's a catch-all term, much like "rock." It doesn't necessarily mean it needs to be included in the infobox. See WP:UNDUE, WP:FRINGE and WP:EXTRAORDINARY. MoonJet (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]