Jump to content

Talk:One Son

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOne Son has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starOne Son is part of the The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 series, a good topic. It is also part of the The X-Files (season 6) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2010Good article nomineeListed
July 26, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
February 14, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Filming and Visual Effects Section

[edit]

The comments quoted in this section seem contradictory and confused. For example, if the production values were excellent then how were the special effects poor? I fixed what I could in terms of grammar, but someone needs to check that. ThirteenOfTwo (talk) 00:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:One Son/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Sure, I'll take this. I've never seen a second of The X-Files in my life — in fact, I don't think I've touched FOX since 1992 — but heck, this thing's only been sitting since October.

Episode articles are a bit tough to write since only a select few episodes get enough significant secondary coverage to warrant an article. In this case, however, I think we've got it. I do know enough about The X-Files to know that it can be very complex with its plots, so the lengthy plot summary is acceptable. The rest of the content is what is to be expected: writing process, filming, critical reception, awards. All looks good; the online links check out and the offline sources are acceptable in good faith (although the book sources should have an ISBN). I did remove the link to "Critical Myth," which appeared to be an unreliable fan site (the fact that its webmaster's e-mail is a Yahoo! address was a big red flag.

Otherwise, everything looks passable here, so I'll give it the green disc. Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 02:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]