Jump to content

Talk:One-north MRT station/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 22:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Lead

[edit]
  • no comments here

History

[edit]
  • Although the steering committee was concerned that this realignment might reduce the development potential of the surrounding land, the development group suggested mitigating this issue by increasing the land density instead. all "this"s should be converted to "the"s

Details

[edit]
  • link cathedral
  • link Las Vegas
  • link UV exposure

Sources

[edit]
  • what makes TODAYonline Blogs reliable?
    • It's a blog of a news website, which is still reliable in my view since it still involves journalists from said news outlet
  • there is three variations of the LTA in sources: one has www.lta.gov.sg, two have LTA , and five have Land Transport Authority.
    • Fixed all to Land Transport Authority
  • Earwig shows a 12.3%.
  • [1] and [2] has a broken archive
    • I fixed for [2]. [1] should actually still work for if you click on it, it should download a document.

Addressed the above comments.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.