Talk:On-again, off-again relationship

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... I'm still editing it. Come back in an hour! --Jimthing (talk) 03:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I am surprised this page was not on here. Keep working on it, find sources. I will help. Tinton5 (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added some further info. Can't find many citations to link for for this though, for obvious reasons, such a term —while obvious to most in everyday conversational understanding— is not exactly defined. Hence associated terms I have added as redirects to this page. --Jimthing (talk) 04:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done. The page itself is describing the term, so adding 50 sources is not necessary. For the size of it, the amount of sources is sufficient and covers most of the material given. There is still future opportunity to expand, which is what the stub is for. If you think this page cannot be expanded any more, then you have the option to remove the stub tag, since you are the creator of the page. Tinton5 (talk) 05:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This whole article is ridiculous and has no place in the intertube encyclopedia of record. Suggest it be removed as lacking sufficient meaning for existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.65.223 (talk) 04:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After seven years — as in SEVEN FREAKIN YEARS — this "article" has failed to deserve Stub status. It's nothing more than a dictionary entry with a couple of footnotes and some trivia. Delete.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not really accurate. It's a reasonable stub.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 23:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Social Attraction and Relationship Development

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2023 and 28 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saher9 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jennyzwerl4.

— Assignment last updated by Kdoming5 (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity?

I was thinking of adding a section titled 'In Popular Culture' to discuss famous celebrities with on-and-off relationships and how this type of relationship is portrayed in TV or movies. It seems to have a good amount of coverage, but I’m not sure if it’s a good idea? Lililolol (talk) 18:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]