Talk:Omen IV: The Awakening

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This film is incredibly poor quality and does not sit sequentially with the omen trilogy. It is not considered canon with The Omen series. --Brideshead 23:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, the film seems to be more of a weird sort of parody/homage of the omen trilogy rather than a serious continuation. It is like cartoonish satanism with exaggerated 'omens' accompanied by creepy music and extreme characters. Remembering the description on the tape of this at the video store read, "terror and destruction seem to follow Delia wherever she goes. The preist who baptized her mysteriously dies, the psychic fair she attends burns in a fiery holocaust and her nanny falls from a second story window, impaling herself on a merry-go-round. Soon, Delia's mother begins to questions the "conincidence" of these catastrophes." ...joke, right? This film also featured key elements of the original musical score from the first Omen by Jerry_goldsmith, most notably the 'ominous' opening theme. It seems a decent film if you take into account it is direct to video/tv (which?) and not take it very seriously. ^^ Izapuff (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Abbythecat (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)This was a TV movie, not direct-to-video. It was released in theaters in England. Can anyone explain how FINAL CONFLICT ends with the second coming of Christ, and yet in this movie, made 10 years later, that still hasn't happened? Also, the first 3 films made it clear Damien was the anti-Christ, yet this film says he wasn't -- he was just the grandfather of the anti-Christ. So what was the point of the first 3 movies, with everybody saying Damien was the anti-Christ and trying to kill him? Everybody was wrong? I guess what I'm really saying is I don't see how this can possibly 'count' as part of the series -- if you include it, then the first 3 films mean nothing and make no sense. Anyone got a comment on this? AbbythecatAbbythecat (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Format of initial release

"Omen IV: The Awakening is a 1991 TV-movie, straight-to-home video release..." Seems to me that a movie can be either a TV-movie or straight-to-home video; it can't be both. Which was it? Fitfatfighter 05:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fanatics

i think fan is enough said, i mean i'm a fan and i think that this is a good idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.45.40 (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

Can someone who has actually seen this film recently try to clean up the article. It's very poorly written, and difficult to follow. I'd do it, but I can't force myself to watch this horrible movie again! 170.145.0.100 (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]