Talk:Ohio Graduation Test
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ohio Graduation Test article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Ohio Graduation Test. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Ohio Graduation Test at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Faculty reception
[edit]I think there should be a section on what teachers and administrators think about the OGT. I go to one of the two Excellent rated schools in the Cincinnati district and all of the teachers at my school consider it a joke. My chemistry teacher told me that e would be better off learning real science in his class and to not answer questions the way we would if he asked us about them because he's had experience with the test readers not understanding correct answers and marking them wrong. My history teacher said that we should study for the SS test by looking at "all the pretty pictures" in out Norton texts. Millancad (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Relevance of Justin Jeffre's Opinion
[edit]The Ohio graduation test is certainly not perfect. It is sometimes the focus of editorials and news stories. Because of the criticism (which is similar to all standardized exit exams), the OGT is to be replaced with a different system. We would need many pages to document the editorials opposed to the OGT. We would need considerably more to document every letter that is sent to the Ohio Department of Education complaining about it.
Therefore, I propose removing the complaint by Justin Jeffre (likely added by Justin himself). A letter from an unknown man with little knowledge regarding education policy or state assessments is hardly worthy of noting on a website with “encyclopedia” standards. Duffman894 (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)