Talk:November 2001 Atlantic Canada storm complex

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the November 2001 Atlantic Canada storm complex article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

November 2001 Atlantic Canada storm complex was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 10, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
May 24, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
December 2, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Weather: Non-tropical Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Assessment

Very good for such a difficult storm! CrazyC83 01:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Hurricanehink (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination passes

Overall this is a very well-written article. It is also very well cited, although my only qualm with the article is that the lead section is not sourced. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 04:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Noel (2001)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I am delisting the article because I believe it is at the at the wrong title (improperly focused). It is more about the Canadian storm complex, so I will switch to that being the focus. As the article will be moved, I don't think it should remain a GA. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]