Talk:No. 1 Group RAF

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal No. 1 Group RAF is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing helicopters

According to the RAF website the transport choppers (Chinook, Merlin and Puma) are part of 1 Group. (SAR choppers are correctly given under 2 Group.) That website can get out of date, and I don't really know so I'm reluctant to fix this article myself. I hope somebody sorts it out. Macguba (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:1 Group badge.jpg, found on No. 1 Group RAF, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 17:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subordinate stations is outdated

why don't those insisting on HMS Ajax updated the "Subordinate stations" section?Phd8511 (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 1 Group RAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120613205457/http://www.rafweb.org/Grp01.htm to http://www.rafweb.org/Grp01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]