Talk:Ninne Pelladata (1996 film)

India: Andhra Pradesh / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Spelling

Is it "Pelladutha" or "Pelladatha"? - the articles uses both. DH85868993 (talk) 03:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or "Pelladuta", as the article is now titled. DH85868993 (talk) 12:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's "Pelladatha", clearly the most widely used including its imdb page. I tried moving it to Ninne Pelladatha but it cannot be moved manually. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 12:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

its right spelling. Imdb is not a standard. I will edit imbd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagarjuna198 (talk • contribs)

Which one do you believe is the correct spelling? DH85868993 (talk) 13:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please check the transliteration of నిన్నే పెళ్ళాడతా. He doesnt seem to know the language, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagarjuna198 (talk • contribs)

I don't know the language either - can you please clarify what you believe the correct spelling to be? Also, please sign your comments with ~~~~ DH85868993 (talk) 13:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ninnepelladuta Nagarjuna198 (talk)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293457/ (Nagarjuna198 (talk))

wht link did u just post? its a 1968 movie. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 13:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

So what its Telugu movie with same name.Nagarjuna198 (talk)

For deciding on an article title, it should have characteristics like "Recognizability" and "Naturalness ", means Titles should be recognizable and readers should be readers are likely to look for or search with and editors should be able to link from other articles. Such titles usually convey what the subject is actually called in English. The spelling "Pelladatha", clearly the most widely used one. And also considering the transliteration of నిన్నే పెళ్ళాడతా, the title should be "Pelladatha" or "Pelladata" but could not be "Pelladuta", which is the current title. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 13:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Like I said I am fine with Ninne Pelladata or Ninne Pelladuta. But its definitely NOT PelladaTHA or PelladuTHA. In telugu త-ta, థ-tha, ద-da, ధ-dha and hence Dh and Th are used when there is stress on the letter. Telugu Readers are going to search with Ninne Pelladata or Ninne Pelladuta. I feel that you are pushing Tamil POV. Since you are also OK with "Ninne Pelladata" I will change it to "Ninne Pelladata". Nagarjuna198 (talk)

@Nagarjuna198, as already explained to you at my talk page thats not how we decide spellings of the articles here. You need to show reference of the spelling you are proposing with respect to this and only this film. No other films, no normal spellings, no non-reliable sources including IMDb will work. Same applies for the film Shubha Lagnam.
Also sign yourself with four tildes ~~~~ and not just three. Fourth one adds date and time. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 22:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Pelladatha" has got more references than the rest of the 'variations'. This is clearly and most widely known used spelling which possess the Recognizability characteristic to be the article title. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 03:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ninne Pelladata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223040803/http://www.cinegoer.com/nagarjuna175.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/nagarjuna175.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]