Jump to content

Talk:Nick Riewoldt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo?

[edit]

Nick Riewoldt is regarded highly in the football world, yet he still doesn't have a photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.3.137 (talk) 00:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we could always use *that* photo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.104.32 (talk) 07:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Career History

[edit]

There is next to nothing here about his rise to professional level. Where was he born, and did he grow up entirely on the Gold Coast?

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited claim

[edit]

the claim under the '2008 season' about Riewoldt not standing up when the team needs him should be cited by a professional sorce.Not only have I never heard this claim made in the media but there is considerable evidence that it is false. If this criticism was was ever infact made by a reliable un-bias source it should be cited otherwise deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.10.82 (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seemed to be someone's personal opinion - it's now been removed. Somno (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wat the?

[edit]

wat happened to this article. last time i was here it had a reasonal amount of information. where did it all go? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.195.171 (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

♥LOVE LIFE♥

[edit]

Nick Riewoldt is Currently Dating american, Catherine Heard and first took her into the eyes of the public on Monday 20th Of Septemeber 2010, the 2010 brownlow medal count night

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.20.113 (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

How come...?

[edit]

He's front page news and yet his bio doesn't mention it - any reason why? --Pete (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know why too 118.209.65.244 (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo controversy

[edit]

I reverted the edit removing the photo controversy section because the section was well cited, and it seemed to have been widely reported. Not sure why it's not relevant. Agtx (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nick Riewoldt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]