Talk:Newel

Untitled

re: the comment `but never the ones at the landings...`

ummm, why not ?

and furthermore, why wouldn`t one automatically think to include reasoning behind such a bold, doom & gloom statement. Natural human reaction to being spoken to as such would normally be one of defiance & stubbornness.

i would think the author, in order to have readers stay in harmony with the articles intention, would see to the inclusion such an explanation, so as to avoid any unnecessary confusion with the matter.

the statement in question currently reads more like a challenge than informative, and certainly does nothing to support and promote Wikipedia, nor does it serve to elevate Wikipedias creditability to any degree.

this may, at first, seem to be a bit of an stretch, but as an example of what i mean here, check out Wikipedias talk page guidelines (see the link above), and the first point under the how-to-use section.

How to use article talk pages

* Communicate: If in doubt, make the extra effort so that other people understand you, and you get a proper understanding of others. Being friendly is a great help. It is always a good idea to explain your views; it is less helpful for you to voice an opinion on something and not explain why. Explaining an opinion helps in convincing others and reaching consensus.

thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.11.55.241 (talk) 20:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)