Talk:New Zealand men's national football team results (2000–2019)

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: National Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the national teams task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Previous Results

Is there a reason why the results only go back to 1999?

Apart from the obvious 1982 world cup matches and the qualifying games there are plenty of other good results that can be added here. 219.89.20.104 (talk) 21:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results by year table

Percentage win calculation is nonsensical. Percentage wins should be just that - number of wins ÷ number of games played. Apart from anything else, prior to 1970something there were only 2 points allocated for a win, which makes the current column in the table just made up information.--ClubOranje^T 10:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then remove it. I havent finished it anyway and it was gonna take a while to sort the rest out. I kinda got the feeling that it didnt really show much anyway while i was doing it O for Awesome (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Format

The format as it stands now (before Mr Hall of England's edits) is the best format for the purpose.

It holds far more information about each match and streamlines the page much more than your version, Mr Hall of England. If you still think there is value in your edits, please discuss them here first, so we do not start an editing war.O for Awesome (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article has exceeded template limits and thus needs to be split

Hi O for Awesome, I see that you previously created New Zealand national football team results 1922–69. As this page is in Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded (a category I patrol), it needs to be split again, perhaps to New Zealand national football team results 1970–99. You will notice that the current article display is all messed up, as many templates are not transcluding. Regards, Wbm1058 (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, that's weird. Usually it would do a lot more than it is currently. Thanks for letting me know and sorry for the delayed response. I will get right on it. O for Awesome (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]