Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 30

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 30 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starNew York State Route 30 is part of the State highways in Hamilton County, New York series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 18, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 30/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The name, Adirondack Trail, is only mentioned in the lead, infobox and the highway log, but not in the main prose. Your lead has a stray ( in it "in the town of Hancock (located in Delaware County", or is missing a ).
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    You have a {{fact}} tag in your article. Refs AT and GB do not use citation templates
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    on hold --Admrboltz (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All done, Admrboltz. Thanks for the review!Mitch32(UP) 16:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with Old Route 30

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was support merge. – TMF 18:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I propose a merger because otherwise, Old Route 30, doesn't seem to pass WP:N and I'd nominate it for deletion. --Triadian (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After reading that article, I might be inclined to agree with you, perhaps even adding it as a separate chapter. However, it might also be useful as an article on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hiking Trails. ----DanTD (talk)
Support merge. This trail wouldn't be notable if it was never part of NY 30, and once the NY 30 information in that article is stripped out, there's really nothing else left. I'd just include it in NY 30's history section as an aside. – TMF 22:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If no one objects to the merge, I'll perform it in the next few days. – TMF 13:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York State Route 30. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]