Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 217

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 217 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Harlemville

[edit]

Harlemville is indicated on the Taconic exit sign, but not an obvious location. It is not listed in any of the townships within Columbia County as being a hamlet there. There is a Harlemville Road that CR 21 intersects northeast of the interchange. As per a drive of the entire route--yes, NY 217 does run just a little beyond (east) of the Taconic.Fwgoebel 05:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

How is the county's name spelled. The redlinks are spelled differently sometimes than what the infobox says. Is it "Columbia" or "Coulumbia"? I'm bumping to a C for now Imzadi1979 (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 217/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Well-written article, I made a few minor changes. Please check to be sure I haven't changed anything I shouldn't have, as I wasn't sure about some of the intended meanings of some of the sentences which needed copyediting. Also, Catskill, New York redirects to a disambiguation page, I also wasn't sure which one was the intended target so I left it as is. Other than that, no major issues detected and article was passed without objection. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: