Talk:New York City Police Department Auxiliary Police
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New York City Police Department Auxiliary Police article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems significant to the history of the program that two auxiliaries were shot and killed on March 14, 2007. I'm not sure how that should best be incorporated into the article. Any thoughts? 160.39.19.250 04:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)mithras
- OK mithras prophet, I wrote a new section about Auxiliary Officer safety. I tried to hit the major points that people will be curious about following this tragedy. From the pictures coming out of the scene it looks like the A/POs were NOT wearing vests. Browsing grammarian 05:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
It should be noted that after the unfortunate shooting of the two A/POs that the city decided to fund vests for Auxiliaries
Perhaps someone can find some stories portraying Auxiliaries in a more positive light? Half the stories in that section are about Auxiliaries getting attacked (which really doesn't relate to the article at all) and the other half are about guys who got arrested. Unless someone can find some more positive stories, maybe the section should be removed for POV reasons? What does everyone else think? 148.100.220.91 03:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Auxsup1.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Auxsup1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Article rating
[edit]This article is a C-class article IMO. It has WP:MOS violations and has sections that are either entirely or largely unreferenced. See WP:1.0/B for a description of what is needed for a B-class article. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 18:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Look at the NYPD page and you will see that there are alot more unreferenced pieces of info, yet that page is B class. (t) 19:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- The NYPD article is 104 kb and has 71 references. This page has 12 references in 27 kb. The unreferenced sections in NYPD are proportionately smaller compared to this page. Downgrading this one to C-class. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- I added 16 references. Upgrading it to B-class MOOOOOPS (t) 00:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, nice work. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 00:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. --MOOOOOPS (t) 02:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, nice work. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 00:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Flag
[edit]Why is the flag listed as the Aux unit flag? It appears to be the flag for the NYPD as a whole. Tried to place a link to the flag here, but all it kept doing was putting the image on the talk page =/ Paladin656 (talk) 04:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- I fixed the page so now, below the flag, is a caption that says "Flag of the New York City Police Department". MOOOOOPS (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
NPOV? Hardly...
[edit]"The Transit Auxiliary Forces are comprised mainly of people who were not eligilbe to become sworn officers. Most would not be able to pass the physical and psychological tests. In addittion, a great many have poor social skills and have been unsuccessful in their personal lives. It is common for them to live with their mothers into their 40's and remain single for their entire lives. Many wear the badge of 'nerd' proudly. Wearing a uniform that closely resembles a real officer's affords them a sense of purpose in their otherwise empty lives." I'll remove it. Mathmo Talk 10:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
"As of April 2007, this unit is suspended from patrols for retaliatory reasons," Can this be referenced? Marcgaynor (talk) 04:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Use of non-free images on this article
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/36px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
This article has been identified as containing an excessive quantity of non-free content. Per the Foundation's requirement to keep non-free media use minimal, and per Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria #3, the non-free images on this article have been removed. Please note:
- The presence of a fair use rationale for this article on an image description page does not make it acceptable for a given use.
- Blanket restoration of the non-free images that have been removed can and most likely will be reverted, with subsequent reporting action possible.
- If some restoration is desired, careful consideration of exactly what non-free media to use must be made, paying special attention to WP:NFCC #1 and #8. In most cases non-free media needs to be tied directly to the prose of the article, most preferably with inline citations tying the discussion to secondary sources regarding the image per Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If this is a list type article, please read the WP:NFLISTS guideline. If you wish to dispute this removal, it may be helpful to read WP:OVERUSE, as it answers a number of typical questions and responses to removals such as this. If after reading these, you still feel there is grounds for restoration of most or all of the media that have been removed, please post to Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. ΔT The only constant 00:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Nypd flag.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Nypd flag.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on New York City Police Department Auxiliary Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070930230029/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/nypost/895447021.html?did=895447021&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&date=Sep+11,+2005&author=ANGELA+MONTEFINISE+and+RICH+CALDER&pub=New+York+Post&desc=VOLUNTEER+RAIL+PATROLS%3B+NYPD+SUBWAY-SECURITY+PLAN to http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/nypost/895447021.html?did=895447021&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&date=Sep+11%2C+2005&author=ANGELA+MONTEFINISE+and+RICH+CALDER&pub=New+York+Post&desc=VOLUNTEER+RAIL+PATROLS%3B+NYPD+SUBWAY-SECURITY+PLAN
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Commanders
[edit]The article does not make clear the status of the Commander and other senior ranks. If I understand correctly, they are not promoted from within the ranks but come from the regular police.Bill (talk) 08:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)