Jump to content

Talk:New Warriors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Silhouette

[edit]

Everybody gets a page but poor Silhouette. I keep meaning to get around to it. 18:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Not fair, I know. I mentioned this on the yahoo group. Hope somebody looks into it. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 06:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Silhouette has her own page now as does her brother Midnight's Fire, she's basically a founder so why doesn't she ever get the love? -- Basique 12:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why are characters and teams with no chance of having a page built in the forseeable future redlinked?--Basique 01:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vol 4

[edit]

The info within the NEW WARRIORS VOL 4 Article has been changed; since there's no confirmation as to who the returning Warrior will be, plus the speculations in regards to both Speedball & Penance within the THUNDERBOLTS series.... PaxHouse 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Writer Sean McKeever has confirmed on his 'Site that he isn't writing the Warriors' fourth series; thus the previous info on this rumor has been deleted.....PaxHouse 01:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wind Dancer

[edit]

The Newsarama thread referenced does not say that Wind Dancer is going to be in the New Warriors. Rather it says that a character named "Sophia" (as opposed to "Sofia") will be in the series. Another character will be able to control wind, but this character, Tempest is not Sophia. Sophia is described as Latina while Tempest is a young black girl. To say that it is confirmed that Wind Dancer is in the New Warriors there needs to be better evidence than this. Jvbishop 12:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the solicts for the New Warriors vol4 #1 it contains a quote "And what do they want from a de-powered mutant named Sofia?" which is a good fit for Wind Dancer with about 10% doubt.Leeisl 14:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, however the Wind Dancer article based the claim on a newsarama article that left a lot more doubt. Jvbishop 14:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Radian and Tattoo

[edit]

Radian is Tattoo's brother, and we've known this since the Omega Gang formed. He also has his own page. This might need confirming, which is why I didn't edit everything. IronMan54 (talk) 04:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC) --Also, would she be put under 'Notable Former Members'?? Or is it too early? IronMan54 (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask if anyone on here could please post a page scan of the deaths of the newest characters and also, can someone please update the page. 98.27.190.112 (talk) 21:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split the Page

[edit]

????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.110.148 (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As it is flagged with an original research banner and a lot of citation requests (and there is room for quite a few more)) it should be obvious that this is heavily failing the reference criteria. (Emperor (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

deleting "Further analysis"

[edit]

OK, I will maybe delete the part "Further analysis" - it clearly defies WP:NOR rule. I will give it few days and then I am deleting it. --Have a nice day. Running 16:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing... --Have a nice day. Running 19:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

more recent picture

[edit]

Is there a more recent picture we can use for the team? The current picture is of the volume 4 team. The only person in that picture that remains a member is Night Thrasher. --198.103.221.51 (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Warriors vs. The New Warriors

[edit]

Isn't the word "the" a part of the title? Therefore shouldn't this article be "The New Warriors" and shouldn't all references to the title appear as: The New Warriors? ask123 (talk) 03:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:New-warriors-20070604090645021.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:New-warriors-20070604090645021.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newwar-070-17.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Newwar-070-17.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Warriors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:New_Warriors&oldid=1202722069"