Talk:New Age Diamonds

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Gemology and Jewelry: Business Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Business subpage.

this page to be added as others in the same category (Synthetic diamonds): Gemesis, Adia, Apollo, Lifegem

Okay, but do not delete the db-tag, just ad "hangon" at the top of the page. To me the article read a bit too much like advertisement for this company. --Kon-Tiki001 11:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly, the text is taken straight from the companys web site, which is clearly a copyright violation, and can't be considered a neutral point of view. --Kon-Tiki001 12:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, how to change it so it will not looks like advertisement? It seems the same description as in Gemesis, Adia, Apollo, Lifegem

not a copy violation (website owner noted):

New Age Diamonds

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as New Age Diamonds, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.newagediamonds.com/company/profile.html. As a copyright violation, New Age Diamonds appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. New Age Diamonds has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:New Age Diamonds. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at New Age Diamonds, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Tucker102 12:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Age Diamonds

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, New Age Diamonds, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. Tucker102 12:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned

OK this should be neither an advert nor an copyvio now. Rich Farmbrough, 16:50 4 December 2006 (GMT).

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it has already been declined for speedy. — Rich Farmbrough, 02:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]
02:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)