Jump to content

Talk:National Security Act of 1947

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emilycs4970. Peer reviewers: Nemerson4970, Aasaro4970, Trevormyrvold.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Public Law Number

[edit]

In doing my research for a separate project, I have found that this page cites the wrong Public Law number for the Act. The correct Public Law Number is 253, making the correct caption as P.L. 80-253. The caption of P.L. 80-235 references to previous H.R. 2225 which was signed into law on July 25, 1947 and can be found at 61 Stat. 423 (1947). Paradiver (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

This summary of the National Security Act of 1947 is helpful, but I would also reccommend including the full text of the article and "plain English" summaries of the more noteworthy segments, as I'm sure they're as complicated as any other legislation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.99.170.81 (talkcontribs) 06:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting segments of the text at least and glossing them seems like a good idea. Alexander 007 05:12, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where signed?

[edit]

I remember hearing the Truman actually signed the act aboard his Air Force C-118 Liftmaster, Independence, since this was the act that created the United States Air Force, but so far have found nothing to support this. Does anyone else know of this? --rogerd 03:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found it. It was his C-54 --rogerd 03:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

[edit]

If this bill was signed on the Presidential Plane, how come the picture captioned is in the Oval Office?

Oh, nevermind. Well that was stupid.

Yeah, I don't get it either. The picture should be removed if it doesn't conform with the facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.13.40 (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture and Where signed?

[edit]

Right. Different act. Different time. Also, who signed it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.154.58 (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

7bells (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History?

[edit]

Where's the history of this significant act? If it wan an Act of Congress, when was this brought before Congress? What kinds of things were discussed of debated? Etc., etc. Thanks! Misty MH (talk) 23:20, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Security Act of 1947. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Security Act of 1947. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles and Books to be Used in the Future

[edit]

Hello all! Here are some sources I will use in the future, posted here for reference. Note: All cited using APA format.

  • Pressler, L. (1982). U.S. senators from the prairie. Dakota Press.

-- Emilycs4970 (talk) 22:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

[edit]

Hello, fellow Wikipedians! I added a Titles section to describe the three titles of the act. Does anyone oppose to me removing the Actions section, as it does not offer any new information? --Emilycs4970 (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative history updates

[edit]

Hey all, I changed the section "History" to "Legislative history" and added a ton of new information. I cited everything I added, so there shouldn't be a problem, but please let me know if I missed anything or if you disagree with the way I formatted it or anything! I'm open to suggestions. -- Emilycs4970 (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section removed

[edit]

Good afternoon all (again), I'm going to go ahead and remove the Actions section, as it offers no new information and the information given is either uncited or the citations are defunct. -- Emilycs4970 (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]