Talk:Nasreen Paracha

Nasreen Paracha has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 23, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nasreen Paracha/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 19:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

Non-free use rationale on the image is in great condition.
- Thank you! – DarkGlow (contribs • talk)
"awarded awarded" → "awarded"
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Add parts from every section to the lead to summarize the article.
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The storylines section looks good.
- Thank you! – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As with other articles, recite references after every quote per WP:REF.
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 13:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Try to reduce the use of quotes in #Development.
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 13:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find any actual issues at #Reception, but adding reviews from critics of her character would be nice.
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 13:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Overall, remove quotes and expand the entire article, as it only has 8 references at the moment.
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 13:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Archive all sources (either manually or with this tool).
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The reference after "2020 RTS Yorkshire Awards" should not be linking to highlighted text.
- Done – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·