Talk:NTPC Ramagundam

India: Telangana Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Telangana (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More references needed

Hello everyone,

This article desperately needs more references and citations. I recognise that by just stating this I am not helping much, but after doing a fair amount of copy editing on this article I would like to see that stuff is verified. As it is ranked high-importance on WikiProject Telangana, I hope a member will give this article a look, since they will likely have more ease in finding appropriate sources etc.

Thanks, ritenerek ^talk :) 21:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Discussion

Request received to merge articles: NTPC Ramagundam into NTPC Limited; dated: September 2024. Proposer's Rationale: Owned by NTPC and there is little to no reason to have seperate article, All plants are owned by one company. Discuss here. Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reasoning that ownership alone negates the need for a separate article is flawed. NTPC owns over 40 power plants, each with its own unique history, specifications, and role in the power grid, which merits individual coverage. By this logic, assets like ships and submarines wouldn't require separate articles simply because they belong to a Navy, which clearly is not the case. Just as vessels have distinct operational details and historical relevance, power plants, including NTPC Ramagundam, deserve their own space on Wikipedia to provide comprehensive information to readers. Consolidating all into the parent company's article would diminish the depth of detail that each asset offers. iAshwinDeshmukh Deshmukh.3851 talk 21:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]