Talk:Mount & Blade: Warband

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (1 participant)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

References and Ratings

References 12 and 13 no longer lead anywhere, and the ratings that reference them are clearly unrealistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.97.70 (talk) 04:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleonic Wars and Holdfast: Nations At War

It seems that the game Holdfast: Nations At War was heavily influenced by the DLC Napoleonic Wars from this game. The gameplay is almost the same and there are many similar classes. Is there not more information about the influence from this DLC on the game? I have played both and both the DLC and the game have a very acting player community. I couldn't even find a Wikipedia articale about Holdfast: Nations At War. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:31A3:A000:1449:C848:87C9:B935 (talk) 21:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion?

At the very least it's a stand-alone expansion as I have it and I don't have the original game. The graphics have also been updated somewhat. Page needs to be fleshed out a bit more by someone more familiar with it and the previous game. 203.217.150.68 (talk) 01:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, apparently I can't read... I notice those things were all mentioned already. 203.217.150.68 (talk) 01:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requires Steam

Should mention that the expansion requires Steam. Even if you buy a physical copy it will automatically boot Steam and install as a Steam game. The reason why I didn't buy it digitally was to avoid the terrible Steam service, ugh. 75.74.188.74 (talk) 04:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are also non steam versions available. Writing "this version requires steam" is too generalizing.69.196.135.166 (talk) 03:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Steam section as-is is pretty silly.. Steam is hardly a draconian solution eating your computer's resources. If your computer can run Mount&Blade satisfactorily, Steam shouldn't even be a blip on your resource radar.

It is not so much as "Steam eats resources" instead of "Steam is not mod-friendly." Try modding GTA:SA or Oblivion with Steam. It's a nightmare. 75.74.188.74 (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It may come down more to the game than Steam. There's absolutely no problem modding Company of Heroes, ARMA2, IL2 1946, or indeed Warband. Warband is particularly easy thanks to the module system it uses - you don't even need to touch Steam settings / properties. 203.217.150.68 (talk) 06:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yeah that's more about the game itself, not steam. Torchlight is also easy to mod and that's on steam. If the developers are modder friendly it will be easy to mod, if not, it won't simple as that. 202.53.199.23 (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I didn't get my GamersGate copy to work on steam... 95.96.128.2 (talk) 01:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mods

There should be a section on mods, including a list and reviews of some kind (perhaps metascore numbers), including indications of popularity. Bugginess/unfinished mods should be noted. Links to mod sources would also be good. Perhaps also some information on different places to find online multiplayer games (e.g. Steam, other game services, independent servers(?), etc. Heavenlyblue (talk) 23:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

request edit

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

The final few lines of the article's segment on the "Napoleonic Wars" DLC (quoted below) are a purely subjective opinion, lacking any form of evidence or citation. Given that there is no way to prove the comments either way (as far as I am aware those comments have never been vindicated by any major review of the product or company) those lines should be removed.

The comment in question:

Flying Squirrel Entertainment's relationship with the community has deteriorated rapidly since release, and they have faced an increasing level of criticism from the player-base, partly due to the infrequent and bug-prone content patches, lack of optimization, failure to address key concerns and general mismanagement of the community.

Old request appears to have been implemented. – S. Rich (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Despre mount and blade warbend

Bună eu sunt Andrei! eu vă pot ajuta cu ceva despre; joc acest mountain blender warbend. Acest joc este? joc de luptă pe câmpuri și acel joc nu este valabil foarte valabil: ce vă interesează doar pe voi nu și pe alții! Dacă vrei să vă facă unul altcineva trebuie să chemați unul din celălalt ?așa că nu am cu ce să vă fac eu ;duceți vă și la alți cu care poate să vă facă de orice. Nu uitați vă conectați pe Facebook să vă dea pe -ntru că v a dat toate jocurile care le aveți sau pe tweeter. Cu drag Andrei! 2A02:2F0B:9116:B000:ADAA:EA14:1D76:99C9 (talk) 10:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]