Talk:Morrison government

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morrison government article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Politics Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Morrison government is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Pentecostalism

This page should Note that Scott Morrison government is first one led by a Australia’s first Pentecostal prime minister. its a historic.MroWikipedian (talk) 09:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are no reliable sources that suggest that Morrison's religion will have any impact on the decisions of the government that he leads. WWGB (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

that doesn't matter at all. its just stating a fact that he comes from a different religion then all other prime minsters. its a milestone. MroWikipedian (talk) 11:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC for this. See WP:RFCBEFORE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So what happened to this talk. MroWikipedian (talk) 03:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Food safety

I think this is misleading, as no one has been charged under the federal legislation, and no one will be charged under this legislation after the recent strawberry contamination. The text makes it sound like ScoMo has had some effect, but I don't think this is true.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to clarify this.--Jack Upland (talk) 06:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

The "Aftermath of Turnbull defeat" section stretches all the way to December 2018 and could be extended further. Of course, the whole of the Morrison government is part of the aftermath, but I think we should reserve the term "aftermath" for the immediate aftermath. I think this section should be split or renamed, but I'm not sure how.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The section "Wentworth by-election" is made up of Turnbull's commentary and actions, and those of his son, which are barely mentioned in the by-election article. They are not very relevant here, and I propose transferring them to the other article. Essentially, the significance of the by-election for the Morrison government is that they lost another seat. The tone of the section seems to be trying to put the blame on Turnbull, which is irrelevant and biased.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now done.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Turnbull initiatives

Should this article exclude achievements that were Turnbull government initiatives?--Jack Upland (talk) 08:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the information about "modern slavery".--Jack Upland (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]