Talk:Mojave City, Arizona

Ghost towns Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arizona Low‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Conflicting history

In researching Castle Dome Landing, Arizona, I came across a reference that mentioned both that town and Mohave City. The reference I found seems to contradict the information in this article. Here is a paraphrase of the reference in question, as well as a citation for the ref:

Indian threats to miners on the southern portion of the Colorado River spurred the creation of Fort Mohave by the US Army. The relative safety provided by the military presence led to the founding of Mohave City adjacent to the fort. Mohave City served primarily as a recreation town and its saloons and brothels thrived, thanks to the ample supply of miners and soldiers. The town was short-lived, however, as Fort Mohave expanded its borders to include the townsite in 1869, mostly to get rid of it. The port town of Hardyville, created in 1864 and just north of Mohave City, gained in prominence once Mohave City was no more.

<ref name="urbanism">{{cite book |last=Moehring |first=Eugene P. |title=Urbanism and empire in the Far West, 1840-1890 |publisher=University of Nevada Press |date=February 1, 2004 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cyahw6pinKMC&lpg=PA286&dq=mohave%20city%20arizona&lr=&pg=PA286#v=snippet&q=%22mohave%20city%22&f=false |pages=286 |isbn=0874175658 |accessdate=2009-09-10}}</ref>

Another source I have (Sherman, Ghost Towns of Arizona) corroborates the 1869 date for the expansion of Fort Mohave. The article seems to say that the expansion of Fort Mohave took place in 1938.

I will continue to look for other references on this ghost town to see which history seems more accurate, but I wanted to include this as a head's up. --Transity ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know what to say, I mean if you can back what you just posted up with another source I say put it on the article.--Coldplay Expert (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't take my comment the wrong way. One thing I've learned is that nailing down facts on ghost towns can be notoriously difficult, and you can often find conflicting information across multiple reliable sources. Even basic facts can be hard to pinpoint. In fact, the entire premise of my rewrite on Castle Dome Landing, Arizona was flawed because the initial sources I found made it sound like it was the same location as Castle Dome, Arizona, just under a different name. As it turned out (as Pete Tillman pointed out), that's not the case at all, and the towns were 17 miles apart.

So don't let this dissuade you from writing about ghost towns. It's part of the challenge, and no one (least of all me) will cast aspersions if you are simply following sources that turn out to be wrong or misleading. I will check some other sources, and see what I can find. --Transity ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and I was pertty sure that this was a hard sybject to work on but it is one of my favorite so dont worry I wont give up.--Coldplay Expert (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another source corroborates the 1869 date: here. I'll go ahead and drop this into the article shortly. Thanks. --Transity ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mohave City, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090303094852/http://www.mohavevalleychamber.com:80/area-info to http://www.mohavevalleychamber.com/area-info

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]