This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
An anonymous poster and a brand-new editor added material here that said that this reformist has suddenly changed his ways after spending some time in prison and, no, he wasn't drugged to obtain confessions or anything like that.
how is the information not in the source?! i am truly baffled! it is very clearly in the source. perhaps the source information has not been completely read by the editor?! but it is definitely in there. the edit that has been removed before is basically a reiteration of the source information. by the way, it is from a reliable source and it is in fact taken from first hand accounts, so the source information cannot be disputed. i will reinstate it once again, and i hope to hear your more detailed opinion because i do not seem to understand your current POV.Roving comp-ranger (talk) 10:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
