Talk:Mike Stark

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Note to trident13. You added a notability template less than 30 minutes after I created the article, and asked.... "(created page outline - have LOTS more to add. Please wait at least 5 days before judging content - thanks)" The OReilly and Allen incidents are widely documented in 100's of WP:RS V places, and the Allen incident spurred Air America to hire him. - F.A.A.F.A. 00:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair to trident13, an article shouldn't be in the main namespace unless it already qualifies. I usually create a draft in user space, then move it to main when most of the work is already done. I think you can get this article up to snuff pretty quickly though (see section below)). Crockspot 19:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your claim that a chef and real estate agent turn up 'ahead' of Mike Stark on Google...

161,000 Ghits for "mike stark" "george allen" Ghits

301 GNewshits for the same: Gnewshits - F.A.A.F.A. 00:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BIO

I think the easiest way to get this article to qualify per WP:BIO would be to meet this criteria: The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person. I added one sourced incident from the AP. If you added one or two more, that would sew it up on notability. Just be careful about WP:NPOV. If there is a reliable secondary source for his hiring at AAR (like a newspaper article) that would be another one. That claim needs a source anyway. - Crockspot 18:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the introduction of the O'Reilly quote a bit. "Arch-nemesis" was unsourced, and seemed POV, and "outburst" was definitely POV, if you listen to the clip. I didn't see the need to characterize the comments at all, since they were quoted right after. What is the deal with O'reilly and Olberman? Did Bill really cut the guy off for mentioning his name, or did he say something else after? They run a seven second delay on those shows. Crockspot 23:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag removed

I think notability has been established now, the article is well referenced and neutral too. - Crockspot 03:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Mike Stark

I know it's considered bad form to edit your own article, but that's about all I know about wikipedia's cultural norms. I hope I'm not stepping out of line by posting here... Just thought I'd offer some more data... My dob: 9/23/68, born in Glens Falls, NY... I consider yself more of an activist than a blogger... Had success in the Allen race, against KSFO (NYT article second page of googling my name), and I'm responsible for the "Hannity Sucks Ass" sign that made it onto Fox at the Lamont primary celebration. Most recently, I've been in the news because Fox lawyer Dianne Brandi sent the dean of my law school (UVa - John C. Jffries) a letter asking him to investigate my conduct for possible violations of the school's standards of behavior...

Anyway, not sure if any of this was helpful; if it was, take what you want, leave the rest.

Mike, you're a dick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.124.112 (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike, you are a hero, I was proud to contribute $50 back when you were running the wingnuts website. you should make a documentary, 'Confronting neo-nazis in America'

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mike Stark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

I removed a whole chunk of lengthy quotes, overly detail explanations from the lead regarding a recent arrest. This is not to say the incident isn't notable but how is this okay for the lead?. It gives too much weight to recent events and the lead is meant to be a summary of the article, not a place to publish recent news. I'm honestly surprised by how long this stood in an article about a living person. It was not even well written, mostly a bunch of quotes taken from a Fox article. If this is re-added it would have to be completely reworked.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]