Talk:Michael I of Wallachia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox; all good
• Section 1; all good
• Section 2; all good
• Section 3; better to keep the family tree in an expanded mode
• The image needs some parameters to be fixed.
• 13.8% confidence, violation unlikely.

Very well written, flawless. Sorry for the delay. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga:, thank you for your review and suggestions. I hope I fixed all parameters of the image. Sorry, I am not a native English speaker and I do not understand your remark about the family tree. Borsoka (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

That doesn't matter much. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 23:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 23:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)