Talk:Merapioidus villosus
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Criorhina villosa Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Criorhina villosa Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 12 October 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
result: Move logs: source title · target title
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
– Species is no longer in Merapioidus, but it won't allow me to overwrite the existing redirect that's got the correct title. Dyanega (talk) 14:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: pages with content, such as Criorhina villosa, are ineligible to be proposed titles in move requests unless they, too, are formally dispositioned. "Criorhina villosa → ?" has been added to this request to meet that requirement. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 15:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Seems like this should be a merge rather than a move. BegbertBiggs (talk) 15:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- That's my fault for not checking more carefully; in 99% of these cases I've encountered, one of the two pages is a redirect. Clearly, in this case someone created a second article for the same species under the other name. It doesn't even need to be a merge request; there is so little content that I would only need to modify the Criorhina villosa article slightly. To cancel the move request, do I just remove the template, or what? Dyanega (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.