Jump to content

Talk:Maya civilization/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zanhe (talk · contribs) 20:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll be reviewing this article. It looks very well written and I'm familiar with some of the main author's past work. It'll probably take me a few days to read the article and some of the numerous cited sources. -Zanhe (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    The prose is clear and concise, and well written. Spotchecked against a few sources available online, and no copyvio found. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Lead, layout, formatting are in compliance. Not related to fiction or lists. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    Yes. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
    Reliable sources cited throughout. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    All conclusions or opinions are supported with reliable neutral sources. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Yes. I can't think of any important aspect that the article does not cover. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Article is long because of the complex nature of the subject covered. It is focused and does not contain excessive details. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutrally written in dispassionate tone. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    No edit wars. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
    All images are on Commons, either Public Domain or tagged with a free license. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Good use of images and maps. All have appropriate captions. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: It took me hours to read the article and some of the cited sources. But once that's done, it's really a no-brainer to pass the article. In fact, the article is of a higher quality than many FA's I've seen. Kudos to Simon Burchell for the hard work he's done to bring the article on this important and fascinating subject to such a high standard. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]