Jump to content

Talk:Max Chandler-Mather

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CFMEU Rally appearance - ABC source

[edit]

The ABC is a highly reliable source. It is typical for a spokesperson's name to not be included in a news article. The quote adds to the article because it clarifies that Max asked for the signs to be removed.

Additionally I'm unsure if such in depth descriptions of each sign adds to the article. @Sʜaɴks BlueMountainPanther (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ABC is reliable. There can be little doubt that the spokesperson said what they said, but they provided no evidence for their claim. To include that claim would detract from the account of the substantive event. @BlueMountainPanther Sʜaɴks (talk) 13:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the ABC wrote it is reliable information. Plenty of wiki articles contain info that is only in written articles and not captured on video. It is relevant as it shows that Max does not approve of the signs. BlueMountainPanther (talk) 01:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sʜaɴks: Chandler-Mather and his spokesperson's comments are highly relevant. This article is about Chandler-Mather, not about the rally. Frankly, the amount of the article spent commenting on the event is already probably undue weight on a controversy which, in the sources cited, is a criticism levelled only by his political opponents (and almost solely by a single MP on the attack!) Jjamesryan (talk | contribs) 14:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]