Talk:Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page is related to the 2012 NNU Class Project, an article creation project involving students from Nanjing Normal University, China |
Pronunciation
[edit]The name, Qin, is pronounced "Chin". It would be helpful if text made this clear. Virgil H. Soule (talk) 22:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Zbvhs, Ok. Is there a source for this? Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Isn't this common knowledge? 46.114.202.91 (talk) 00:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Excavation Schedule?
[edit]With such historical significance, it is hard to imagine that no timetable exists for the excavation of the emperor's tomb. Has anyone had any luck finding such a schedule? 163.29.35.147 (talk) 02:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
The original discovery
[edit]The article doesn't say anything about *how* this magnificent necropolis was actually discovered, but I've always heard the story that it was found by accident, by some local peasants plowing in the ground or doing some kind of construction work. It would have been in the mid-seventies. This sounds likely, but can someone check it and confirm? 83.251.170.27 (talk) 23:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- The article is about the Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor, which people have always known is in the area. The accidental discovery is the Terracotta Army which was not known to exist, and it has its own article and its discovery is mentioned there. Strictly speaking the discovery has no place here, because the discovery is about a related but different subject, although its discovery sparked interest in the mausoleum and the excavation of the necropolis. Hzh (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
There's a confusing sentence at the end of paragraph one of the Discovery of the Terracotta Army section: "Some scholars believe that the so-called "crossing three springs" is just a false finger." What is a false finger? There's also no other mention of three springs in this article. I marked it as Citation Needed, hopefully someone more knowledgeable can clarify & provide a source for this. mtexter3 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2023 (EDT)
Interesting material on the design of the tomb
[edit]For those who are experts on this topic please note the following source:
- "The First Emperor's Terracotta Army recruited outside China" 26 October 2010
Despite the title's focus, the actual article mainly discusses the design elements of the tomb. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 22:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120072354/http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/barbierilow/Courses/fall%20of%20qin%20and%20tomb/player.html to http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/barbierilow/Courses/fall%20of%20qin%20and%20tomb/player.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120072354/http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/barbierilow/Courses/fall%20of%20qin%20and%20tomb/player.html to http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/barbierilow/Courses/fall%20of%20qin%20and%20tomb/player.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Redundancy
[edit]Some points made early in the article are reiterated in later sections. Redundant paragraphs could be removed to make the article more concise. DoritoKing1 (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Clarity
[edit]Under "Opinions on possible excavation," it is written that "opponents of such excavations hold that China's current technology is not able to deal with the large scale of the underground palace yet." The following sentences imply that the technology is not able to deal with the large scape preservation of the mausoleum. However, my first impression upon reading the sentence was that Chinese technology is unable to deal with the booby traps. Can we make it clearer that we're talking about the preservation of the site?
- C-Class Architecture articles
- High-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Death articles
- High-importance Death articles
- C-Class Cemeteries articles
- Low-importance Cemeteries articles
- C-Class China-related articles
- High-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of High-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- WikiProject China/NNU liaison