Jump to content

Talk:Maugrim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I think that, since the original text of the books labels the wolf "Fenris Ulf," this entry should be labeled "Fenris Ulf" as well, and that "Maugrim" searches should redirect to it and not the other way around.

The article doesn't provide any real proof that C.S. Lewis's wishes were for the name to be changed. His name was "Maugrim" in the original, and the only place I know that it was different was in early American editions. In Britian, I do believe it's always been Maugrim. DMAJohnson 03:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be a disambiguation page? 'Cause there's more than one character in fiction called Maugrim, such as one of the Villains in the game Neverwinter Nights. Jacob "Badger Head" Morris 07:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maugrim alive?!

[edit]

This article seems to imply that he survived. I hate to tell you, but in the book and the movie, he was rendered distinctly mutton-like by the actions of one Peter Pevensie. His death in both cases was the reason for King Peter's knighthood. Where did this nonsense come from? Johno 12:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, you've just caught an article in a bad state. I've tried to clean it up a litte, but I don't have a lot of time, nor my books at hand, so if you can expand on the beginnings please do so! --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fenris ulf

[edit]

Actually, I just read the book last night, and his name was Fenris Ulf. I promise that's what I read.

Please read the lead paragraph of this article. You did indeed read 'Fenris Ulf.' --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know why the name was different for so long in the American edition? I've had my edition since I was a child and only just learned about this name difference. Was it done, for some reason, by editorial fiat? Is there some other reason? If it wasn't Lewis's wish, then it seems such a petty thing to do to an author's work. CKA3KA (Skazka) (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maugrim narnia.jpg

[edit]

Image:Maugrim narnia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]