Talk:Mastectomy

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Mastectomy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

May 12 to 18, 2013

This

THis would benefit from a link or addition of the time-course of the discovery that micrometastasis means wide excision is not effective, and by link or insertion discussion of whether Robert S. Mendelsohn was an early discusser of evidence-based treatment, or a nut on this. Midgley 11:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Req photo?! Are you kidding me?! 65.93.145.210 21:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Where does the word "mastectomy" derive from ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Omega Man (talk • contribs) 00:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Early medicine describes all diseases of the breast as mastitis. Removal of the diseased tissue is simply mastectomy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.144.13 (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First Reference

The bibliography for the first reference is unacceptable. Clicking the link takes you to a page without any obvious hint to take you to the referenced study. Additionally, doing an OVID search on "Intergroup Exemestane Study" produces several papers.

Can anyone point me to the right paper that this fact was mentioned in?

I hope in the future a real bibliographical format instead of weblinks would be used, as the internet tends to shift. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furio83 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move down picture?

Please move the image down!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.7.15.39 (talk) 12:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the graphic image, although medical in nature, could be moved lower to the rest of the pictures, so that is gives the "unsuspecting" person a chance to find out what a Mastectomy is, before they even see any images of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.209.162 (talk) 08:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it down just slightly. If someone continues reading the article, they will see it. But if they're unsure what the topic was and stumbled upon it, they won't see such a surprise. kka rma 09:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a terrible photo, and it comes up on mouseover preview in modern browsers. There are ways to have a good cosmetic outcome after mastectomy, but this person's surgeon didn't know any of them. Lord knows there's a bunch of weird people who love putting weird photos on WP under the guise of medicine, but this photo is definitely one that doesn't belong. 03:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Gynecomastia

Mastectomy is sometimes used as the ultimate solution for gynecomastia. I personally have undergone this proceedure, in Canada, in 1982. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.144.13 (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other uses

Anybody want to add the other uses for mastectomy, mainly gender transition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.170.69.88 (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History

The ny times cover featured a model displaying a mastectomy scar In 1993 and the public's reaction. Citation included. RparkerWilliams!1 (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added instructions to click the link to see the actual magazine cover. I thought this would be helpful.RparkerWilliams!1 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Everyone"?

In the article, at the moment, there exists the following:

"Before the operation everyone will meet with the surgeon a few days before the surgery or even the day before, however, a much longer period is very beneficial since it allows the patient for a more objective weighing of the options" [emphasis added]

My wild imagination has conjured up an image of seven billion, four hundred million people crowded around a surgeon's office listening to a pre-surgery consultation broadcast over loudspeakers. What, pray tell, was meant by "everyone" here? Mattman00000 (talk) 12:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This whole section is poorly written from a personal viewpoint without corresponding factual information, and should be either taken down or heavily edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwistedMango (talk • contribs) 03:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mastectomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140719103909/http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-society-of-plastic-surgeons/ to http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-society-of-plastic-surgeons/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gender neutral language?

Should the language be more gender neutral? In the "Medical uses" section in particular, the repitition of "women" seems over the top to me. On the other hand, WP:GNL advises "Do not use gender-neutral speech when it will confuse the reader. For example, it is generally best to write about "pregnant women", rather than "pregnant men and women". Although a few pregnant adults are not women (e.g., some transgender, non-binary and intersex people), the reader will be confused and distracted by the statement that men can be pregnant." Thoughts?

Of the universe (talk) 07:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNL also says "Per consensus at the WP:Village Pump, "the terminology in articles, especially medical articles, is dependent upon the support of reliable sources and it is expected that editors would use the same terminology presented in said sources." (emphasis added) So, we should be equally as gender neutral as the reliable sources. Unfortunately, this article is not well sourced, so it is hard to know how gender neutral to be. Of the universe (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: UCSF SOM Inquiry In Action-- Wikipedia Editing 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 August 2022 and 20 September 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Judyshan97, Inquirybianx, Cic 1234 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Nsbdoc, Gunnarmattson, Kendall.islam.

— Assignment last updated by Nsbdoc (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Team Workplan: Article chosen: Why this one? Include WP rating scale? How fit with your interests. Other details as desired. It is a topic of great importance, and the article has not been edited or updated since 2006. WP rating is a C. We are interested in the medical and non-medical indications for mastectomy.

Teammates: You WP editing team (up to 4) JS, BO, PW

Initial analysis of the article This article is adequately comprehensive, however some of the sources may be outdated and needs to be updated. This page currently has a C rating for quality, but the topic is of high importance.

Overall organization and sense of how much work there is to do There is a decent amount of work to be done, namely updating the citation sources and providing a review of the newest information.

What will you add? The article does not include gender-inclusive language to reflect the diverse experiences of individuals with breast/chest tissue. Also, we will provide updated epidemiology data to this article.

What will you remove? We will remove incorrect information. We will remove statements that are general, not up-to-date, and otherwise not corroborated by a variety of reputable sources. We will also remove anecdotal statements located in the “before,” “during,” and “after surgery” sections.

What will you augment? We will provide an updated perspective on the topic with new citations. We will expand on the use of mastectomy for non-cancer indications (ex. gynecomastia).

What will you decrease coverage of? We will decrease coverage of breast surgery done in ancient Rome. We will also decrease coverage of “before”, “during” and “after surgery” sections.

Roles in the project. Every group member will have the role of overseer, readability editor, researcher, editor/writer, linker, and image editor.

Team coordination plan: Weekly meetings to check in on the progress of the article. These meetings will occur virtually, and a working document on Google Docs will be used to work collaboratively before adding our edits to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cic 1234 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison

Can you compare lumpectomy and mastectomy a little bit more? Nsbdoc (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]