Talk:Marie Bjelke Petersen

	Australia portal Marie Bjelke Petersen is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I thought this writer was interesting enough to warrant a page. Except the title has her name spelt wrong! (How do we fix that?) If others don't pick up the job I will return to do the right thing....but please note I've left good references. Jeremytrewindixon 08:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I fixed it with a redirect and this new article. Tell me what you think. Ursasapien (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Article at Marie Bjelke-Petersen

Something humorous has happened here, I have been working on and off at a page on the lovely Marie at Marie Bjelke Petersen. How this happened will become apparent if one checks the discussion page there. The two pages are complementary and just need to be blended. I will add the citations rquested on this page. One of the citations concerns the non-hyphenated version of the name, which is correct!Jeremytrewindixon 02:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following was copied from Talk:Marie Bjelke-Petersen:

What has happened is that another page has started up at Marie Bjelke-Petersen, more detailed in some ways than this but obviously without the advantage of access to Alison Alexander's excellent work, which is the source of this current page. Hence the wrong spelling of Miss Petersen's name at that page. Melding gotta happen!Jeremytrewindixon 03:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Added Alexander quote on significance of Miss Petersen. Jeremytrewindixon 03:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have appropriately merged and redirected to correct this problems. If more needs to be added, the old copy of Marie Bjelke-Petersen is here. Ursasapien (talk) 04:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion a bit of baby was thrown out with bathwater there, Ursapien. In particular, from the point of view of someone interested in the development of Australian literature, Marie breach of the "bush stereotype, is a large part of her enduring significance. So I've restored that bit. Also some of my remarks about her style are I think worth preserving. And the fact that she was a painter is also important. Alison Alexander questions whether it is true that "she was more poular overseas than in Australia", ceeratinly she was published overseas rather than in Australia but that is a different matter. I don't have my reference to hand right now but will return to all these matters when I do. Jeremytrewindixon 11:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have continued to re-edit page with material from AA's work. Don't have page numbers to hand but will put them in. While MBP's painting did not achieve prominence she was signiifcant as an art teacher.....so there is another head of interest fro her. Jeremytrewindixon 10:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Immortal Flame Date

As I wrote the original stub Marie's novels were listed together with publisher and year of first publication. The publisher had been edited out, apparently in line with wikipedia's (strange) practice.....you can hardly call it a bibliography if you don't list the publisher, if known. But that is a side-issue, more importantly the editing got the date wrong for The Immortal Flame. The first edition was published in 1919, not 1926. There was another edition in 1926. I'm very unhappy with the "life" section of the article, btw, its on my lsit of things to eventually get back to. Jeremytrewindixon 10:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]